Adorations

Airbrushing is harmless until the image itself is distorted by stretching or shrinking parts of a person. It's really unattractive to see photos of women all broken out or caught with ghost foundation face, so tweaking things a little doesn't hurt. It's still you, but without an eruption on your forehead. What's wrong with that?

Use of the software depends on one's attitude towards airbrushing. Some won't, but I know that there will be girls who will go nuts giving themselves plastic surgery with that program. It's not a generalized teen problem, it's one specific to girls with distorted images of themselves.

I think it just reinforces how fake everything is, and that this perfection we see in magazines is due to skilled photoshoppers and does not exist in the real world. It's empowering to see how you too can look like those "photos" in magazines, and those before and after shots show that those stars have imperfections too.

Of course, the this technology can be used in a positive way or negative way like everything else.

Statues

On the concept of Fashion shouldn't be solely about what is and to be worn. It is also and almost about who wears it and had worn it once before. Not to be confused by notoriety or status of life. The interest drawn is about the life that is given in the attitude of the wearer. This implies the status of the health and mind. The good or bad of the health and mind can not denote the absence of Fashion or what and what fashion is construed to be as a whole.